Click here to get this post in PDF
Terrorism is a discussion that fills our halls, whispers, google searches, and debates are full of different perspectives of who the real terrorists are. I do believe the Right and the Left have very similar views these days on the topic of Terrorism, although I feel our focus is in different areas, there is one common ingredient to all of our discussions – reduction of our involvement within the Middle East is imperative.
Terrorism, as a noun, has 3 definition: 1. The use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, especially for political purposes. 2. The state of fear and submission produced by a terrorism or terrorization. 3. A terroristic method of governing or of resisting a government.
Seems to me that both sides of the spectrum are guilty, in fact, very few aggressive nations do not commit acts that are defined as terrorist. The pursuit of power is often progressed through a terroristic act, forced submission of the weaker civilization, the resistance of the citizens against the tyrannical offensive. No matter how you look at it, both sides are in fact terrorists.
Who stands to gain the most by a terroristic invasion of another country? Well, the stronger of the two adversaries that is who. The Islamic Extremists are in fact gaining foot hold on a more sophisticated fashion these days. Through the Muslim Brotherhood, they have acquired great influence over international governments and educational institutions. The extremists are evolving, and preparing a hostile take over, from within. What do they have to gain? World domination? Seems like our civilization has been reduced to game of Risk, who has control of the entire world at the end of the game is the winner. It is a fear every country has, but as our enemies use our own constitution and laws against us, we leave ourselves open to an internal terrorist attack. These are the issues of the future, seeds only being recently planted; we have a more prehistoric outlook on terrorism right now, and it is currently settled in the Middle East.
The pipe line war, there are facts our on air news reporters are neglecting to share with us. This fuel line is to go from the state of Quatar to Europe through Iran, Syria, Israel, and Turkey. The proposed route would benefit all of the countries within its projected path. Iran has its own plan, they have offered a pipe line that would run from Iran through Syria, then Lebanon, and out to sea bypassing both of its enemies (Israel and Turkey). The bypassing both Israel and Turkey is where the real issues arose; when Syria signed an agreement to allow Iran to build it’s pipe line, it angered the Russians, Turks, and the Israelis, thus beginning the war. Why is Russia angry you ask, well simply put, Russia stands to loose the most from the building a pipe line from the Middle East to Europe. Gazprom, a Russian owned Natural Fuel Supplier, provides Europe with more than 60% of its Natural Fuel.
Quatar and Turkey have joined forces in funding the Islamic Extremist group calling itself the Rebel Forces. This group is trained by Al Quada, unleashing them on Syria to satisfy their blood thirst with the main objective being to take down Assad. With a Regime change the original pipeline could begin construction and all the Nations could equally benefit from this project. Russia has joined in uniting with Assad for the simple fact that his resistance on this hostile take over has helped to stall both pipelines. He has been able to raise the prices of fuel costs in Europe, ensuring higher profits for Gazprom. The games being played within the United Nations are sheer politics, there is no expectation of actually reaching an agreement, and it is a simple stall tactic that benefits Russia financially. This is in fact a more diplomatic form of terrorism.
The Rebels are calling out to the Untied States for help, or that is what our media wants us to think. They no longer are receiving weapons from Russia, so they need the U.S to arm them in order for their mission to continue. Congress is reluctant to give the President the authority he needs to press on. They know there is absolutely no proof to determine it was Assad who used the Chemical Weapons at all. There is proof that Russian missiles were released in Syria, contaminated with Sarin Gas, but considering Russia was supporting the Rebels prior to the chemical attack, that leaves far too much room for speculation as to who used them, and why they were used. Now we can only speculate at this point that Vladmir Putin has negotiated with Assad stop to both fuel lines going through Syria, in exchange for His diplomatic support and alliance against the U.S. if Obama was to make good on his threats. Bottom line, ALL parties involved in this tragedy are the true terrorists. There are Men, Women, and Children being murdered and poisoned over Greed and Money, the pursuit of power, and the manipulation of Government. The only person who stands to win this war is the person who has the largest arsenal. It would do the U.S justice to leave this one alone, let them work this out however they feel they need to. We will benefit very little by exhausting our military resources helping either side.
We have plenty on our plate, our own economic crisis to deal with. The issues that have arisen from this war have little impact on the U.S as a whole. If we wish to help Quatar we could help to generate a new game plan. We could negotiate a new plan, offer a mapped out route that would benefit less hostile countries, yet still get the fuel safely to Europe. But our involvement in this crisis would in fact be terroristic in nature; forcing our beliefs on a society that wants to live life their own way would be wrong. And I doubt we will become involved, simply because the motivation of terrorism is to benefit in some way, we have nothing to benefit from so we have no reason to get involved.
